BOSTON U
USA Lacrosse preseason/postseason ranking: Unranked/No. 18
2025 record: 11-5 (6-2 Patriot)
What went right: Instead of taking even a slight step back after graduating a large group of fifth-year seniors who left a major imprint on the program, the Terriers actually improved their record (from 10-7) and returned to the Patriot League final. Jimmy Kohr (43G, 14A), Jimmy O’Connell (34G, 33A) and Patriot League rookie of the year Timothy Shannehan (32G, 29A) were fine offensive centerpieces, and Will Barnes (.575SV%) turned in a superb season in cage.
What went wrong: A year ago, Boston U was left rueing a wasted three-goal lead in what became an 11-10 loss to Lehigh in the Patriot League final. It wasn’t remotely as close this time around, as the Terriers never led in a 17-10 loss to Colgate on the final day of the season that left them on the outside of the postseason.
Season highlight: Beating Army for the fifth time in a row — all since 2022 — doubled as dealing the Black Knights their first loss of the season. The rest of the Patriot League has combined for four victories against Army in the last four seasons.
Verdict: Only six Division I teams have won at least 10 games in each of the last four seasons: Maryland, Duke, Georgetown, Army, Richmond — and Boston U, which has done it six times since 2017. The Terriers are at the point where they don’t do rebuilding seasons, an impressive feat for a program just a bit into its second decade of existence.
A little slippage might have been understandable this season, and it didn’t occur. At the same time, a shaky showing with an NCAA bid on the line will undoubtedly gnaw at Boston U throughout the offseason. But weighing nearly three months of work against one afternoon, it’s hard not to see this year as a success for the Terriers.
RUTGERS
USA Lacrosse preseason/postseason ranking: Unranked/No. 17
2025 record: 7-9 (2-3 Big Ten)
What went right: Sophomore goalie Cardin Stoller (.567SV%) did his job far more often than not. Former Union faceoff ace Matthew Paolatto adjusted seamlessly to Division I, winning 59.2 percent of his draws. Sophomore Colin Kurdyla (27G, 13A) handled the ample attention he received on offense as the clear-cut top option. Princeton transfer Joe Juengerkes was one of the nation’s top short-stick defensive midfielders. The Scarlet Knights crafted a rugged identity predicated on a methodical approach that, by the second half of the season, allowed them to stay in most games.
What went wrong: Kurdyla was the only player on the roster with more than 24 points, and while there were eight other Scarlet Knights with at least 10 points, it simply was not a dynamic offense. Rutgers shot 23 percent for the season and managed more than 11 goals just twice (against LIU and St. John’s). The search for offense was not an unexpected one after the graduation of Ross Scott and Shane Knobloch, but it still provided a fairly narrow avenue for achieving success.
Season highlight: The best Rutgers teams since the establishment of Big Ten lacrosse couldn’t figure out a way to beat Maryland. This one did, earning the Scarlet Knights’ first triumph over the Terrapins since 1980. Stoller made 14 saves as Rutgers built an early four-goal advantage and then smothered Maryland in an 8-6 victory. Toss in victories at Johns Hopkins and Michigan, the latter in the Big Ten tournament, and Brian Brecht’s bunch caused plenty of headaches to conference opponents.
Verdict: Rutgers averaged nine goals per game. Is that good? No, and the No. 62 national ranking in scoring offense reflects it. But the Scarlet Knights demonstrably got better over the course of the season, and arguably their two best players (Kurdyla and Stoller) were only sophomores. This is a team that should feel like it is on an upward arc, and it’s easy to like its defensive identity. But if there’s a step forward in the offing, much of the improvement has to come at the offensive end, since the Scarlet Knights’ defense came close to maxing out in 2025.
MICHIGAN
USA Lacrosse preseason/postseason ranking: No. 16/No. 16
2025 record: 7-7 (3-2 Big Ten)
What went right: Defenseman Pace Billings was every bit as good as expected after arriving from Princeton as a grad transfer. Aidan Mulholland scored 23 goals out of the midfield. Junior goalie Hunter Taylor made steady progress in his second year as a starter and fared better than his .528 season save percentage in five of six games against Big Ten opponents. Ryan Cohen (20G, 26A) produced his fourth 20-20 season and exited as the Wolverines’ career leader in assists (117).
What went wrong: The Wolverines’ faceoff deficit (43.8 percent for the season, 63rd in Division I), a penchant for too many turnovers (16.64 per game, tied for 42nd nationally) and middle-of-the-road shooting (28.8 percent) combined to limit Michigan’s ceiling. The last three years, Josh Zawada, Michael Boehm and Justin Tiernan took turns as 40-goal scorers, and Zawada (77 points in 2022), Boehm (73 points in 2023) and Cohen (71 points in 2024) all had monster years. The offense just wasn’t as dynamic, and it didn’t have the same possession advantage as recent years.
Season highlight: Even if Michigan’s season ended with an 11-8 loss to Rutgers in the Big Ten quarterfinals, there was still a victory over Maryland to celebrate. The Wolverines survived triple overtime to collect an 11-10 victory in College Park on March 22, becoming only the second program (along with 2014-17 Notre Dame) to beat a John Tillman-led Terrapins team four times in a row.
Verdict: In nine games against ACC and Big Ten opponents, Michigan averaged 8.22 goals. In that light, the Wolverines’ 3-6 record in those games was actually quite commendable. Michigan didn’t have enough offensive oomph to generate the late-season surge that carried it to back-to-back Big Ten tournament titles in 2023 and 2024, but it only got thumped twice (by North Carolina and Notre Dame). By the standards of the not-too-distant past, a .500 finish and a winning record in league play would constitute a modestly successful season in Ann Arbor.
But one of the byproducts of the Wolverines’ NCAA trips was to raise expectations, and this didn’t meet the standard of the last two seasons. Michigan’s competitiveness gives it a good place to start from as it looks to reinvigorate its offense (minus the graduated Cohen and Mulholland) in 2026.