© 2026 USA Lacrosse. All Rights Reserved.
Dan Arestia broke the news Tuesday that five former members of the Syracuse lacrosse team — four of whom are currently playing professionally in the Premier Lacrosse League — have sued the NCAA for a fifth year of eligibility in light of the new 5-in-5 rule.
This article first appeared on Arestia's "Sticks In Lacrosse" website and is being republished with permission. The article has been edited slightly for clarity and style.
Syracuse lacrosse players Joey Spallina, Billy Dwan, Luke Rhoa, Michael Leo and Finn Thomson are named plaintiffs in a lawsuit filed against the NCAA in a Colorado court seeking an additional year of eligibility for members of the high school class of 2022.
Other athletes named in the suit are football players Donovan Branch (UConn), Jordan Herman (Sacramento State) and Bryson Taylor (Utah State). NFL agent Peter Schaffer, who played lacrosse at Franklin & Marshall, is listed as the attorney for the plaintiffs.
BREAKING: Legal action has been filed seeking an additional year of NCAA eligibility for athletes in the high school class of 2022.
Joey Spallina, Billy Dwan, Luke Rhoa, Michael Leo, and Finn Thomson have joined the lawsuit.
Story to follow soon.— Dan Arestia (@danarestia) July 28, 2026
The lawsuit is one of many that have been filed for high school class of 2022 athletes following the implementation of the NCAA’s new 5-in 5 rule. Members of the 2022 class were not granted an extra year in this rule, and the suit seeks to grant them a year under this new framework.
Spallina, Dwan, Rhoa, Leo and Thomson are the first lacrosse players first to seek an additional year this way. In this case, the plaintiffs spent weeks trying to work with the NCAA to avoid a lawsuit and come up with a path forward, but the NCAA was unresponsive.
The lawsuit and statements from the lacrosse player plaintiffs make it clear they intend to use their extra year if it is granted. Importantly, the suits say they have discussed this action with current Syracuse head coach Gary Gait, and that they are assured a roster spot is available.
More importantly, that roster spot is not one currently used by a recruit from the class of 2026. This presumably reduces the risk of legal action from 2026 recruits who do not want to lose their roster spot as a result of 2022 players being granted another year of eligibility.
In fact, the suit says the roster spot given to these players, if granted, will not displace any currently rostered players. The suit would not require Syracuse to choose between giving a roster spot to current player or one of the five plaintiffs.
Spallina, Dwan, Leo, and Rhoa have already appeared in pro games in the Premier Lacrosse League. They were drafted and signed three-year rookie contracts. If granted eligibility by the lawsuit, it's not immediately clear what the course of action would be for their pro careers. At a minimum, they would have to be released from their pro contracts, or they'd need to be voided.
Reached for comment, the PLL said, “The PLL is aware of the filing. This is a matter between the plaintiffs and the NCAA, and it would not be appropriate for us to comment on active litigation or on NCAA eligibility policy.”
Dan Arestia grew up playing lacrosse in New Canaan, Conn. He coached youth lacrosse in New Canaan, Darien and Westport and spent seven years coaching at Darien (Conn.) High School. In his time on the sidelines, he coached multiple All-Americans and Connecticut Players of the Year. His coverage of high school, college and professional lacrosse has appeared in Inside Lacrosse, New England Lacrosse Journal, and Prep Network, and he has been quoted in The Ringer and The Wall Street Journal. He also hosts the Sticks In Lacrosse podcast. He has covered Division II and III men's lacrosse and written features for USA Lacrosse Magazine since 2023.